#BookReview: This Land Is Your Land by Beverly Gage

Pessimist Gen X Yale Professor Takes A Selective Road Trip Through America And American History. Understood through this lens, this book isn’t as terrible as it could have been. It is still quite politically oriented in the expected directions from a Yale professor, and its treatment of history is quite surface level and routine, but it is also at least somewhat more balanced than many books from similarly situated authors – so it does have that going for it.

The bibliography clocks in at 15%, which isn’t great, but does meet my bare minimum threshold and there isn’t really much here that would demand a Sagan Standard application – again, this is primarily surface level typical Ivy League Elitist type history.

Indeed, in the areas that Gage travels and covers that I’m most familiar with – specifically, Atlanta – Gage really barely covers anything at all, yet what she does choose to cover is both very surface level yet also, again, reasonably balanced given her current position. She covers Stone Mountain, including both how difficult it is to find in modern Atlanta and how while it remains a hotbed for KKK rallies, these are also seen as a free speech issue where the kooks have to be allowed to speak… but are also largely ignored. She covers MLK and his roots in Atlanta… while missing an interesting deeper dive connection to women’s suffrage and indeed the fight for racial equality that was *right there* at the time and location she was discussing. (Look to when and where Rebecca Latimer Felton, first female US Senator and last formerly slave owning one, died… 😉 )

Overall this is as much travelogue as history, and while it is reasonable as both it also isn’t a particularly deep dive or novel tale in either. Pessimistic and clearly slanted in the expected political direction given her day job and employer, it isn’t *so* heavy handed as to be unreadable… yet those with differing political views also won’t find much use here, as most of the history covered here is fairly standard and well known. Yes, some tidbits here and there are a bit deeper, but really not enough to perhaps justify the read for those with particularly strong political viewpoints that diverge from Gage’s own.

Recommended.

This review of This Land Is Your Land by Beverly Gage was originally written on April 28, 2026.

#BookReview: Dog Person by Camille Pagan

Powerful Examination Of Grief. Look, if I can read this book while staring down my wife’s major heart surgery in less than two weeks while also dealing with my dad living in congestive heart failure for a couple of years now while also having a very old cat… you can read this powerful story of loss and love and finding yourself through your grief too. Yes, you too may be a bit delayed by all of the above and more, or your particular variant thereof, but you can absolutely make it through this book. Indeed, I would go so far as to say you *need* to make it through this book. Because this Autism Acceptance Month, let this Autistic tell you something about our experience: We read as much to learn about the human condition and to prepare our minds to handle different situations and emotions almost as for any other reason – at least some of us. (And maybe even just me – I tend to be so hyper rare as to possibly be unique even among billions of people in so many ways, and maybe this is one of them.)

There is a major spoiler for the epilogue of this book that at least some of you will want to know up front – but it *is* a major spoiler that could alter how other readers approach the book or even whether they give the book a chance at all. So here’s how I’m going to handle this: There will be a paragraph deeper in the review where I will explicitly say that I am going to reveal the spoiler in that exact paragraph, and then I’m going to bury the spoiler in the middle of a lot of reasonable sounding text such that your eye isn’t immediately drawn to it. That way, those who want to see the spoiler can still read that paragraph, but that paragraph won’t stand out to other readers as anything exceptional in any way.

Some, including at least one author I’ve read that knows how to create some very dusty rooms herself, have called this Pagan’s best work yet… and I’m likely to agree with them. The rare perspective on this love story – Pagan’s clear preferred term – that is actually a romance with deep tragic elements – it does in fact meet all known RWA/ RNA requirements, for the couple at hand at minimum, though it may be argued that it meets them in a similar manner as Tom Clancy’s Without Remorse being technically the best romance novel I’ve ever read does. In other words, *I* think the marketing on this book should clearly be as a romance, for a lot of different reasons, but I can also see booklandia in an uproar about that and Pagan and her team choosing to thus be more than touch conservative there.

Which is a bit of irony, as we get into the “these things are in the book” section. First, there are a pair of LGBT romances, both MM and FF, though these are more in passing than actually developed in the story itself. But they exist, and as I noted above, I know some will *love* this book for their presence and others… will choose to skip this book over it. Again, you do you. No judgment from this reader either way there. I will note that even with two of them present at all here, since there is a secondary romance that is fleshed out more than the two LGBT romances but less than our central romance, eh, it actually evens out. Thus, I really do think you should read this book anyway, no matter your thoughts on this topic.

Speaking of that second non-LGBT romance, that is the closest to any level of spice we get, and while it may be *slightly* hotter than a warm glass of milk, it is more akin to an eggnog or perhaps horchata. Note that we’re still not getting anywhere near even mild peppers here, and in fact the scene I’m thinking of is actually one I experienced a version of back when I worked with my church’s bus ministry as a teen. I was walking through a large trailer park on our route when I came across a kid locked out of their trailer. As I’m talking to this kid, I hear a frequent hammering sound. Clearly some kind of book case was being built in this trailer. 😉 Then it dawned on me, and I told the kid they may want to go find a friend to hang out with for a bit and walked away. And that tale shows you pretty well exactly how spicy this book gets. Again, some won’t want to experience even that level of spice in a tale, while others may find that such a mild spice isn’t enough for them. Either way, you do you, but please, if you choose to read this book anyway – and as I said in the title, I believe you should! – please don’t lower your star rating because this was too much or too little for you. That is a you thing, not an actually objective-ish reason to deduct a star. Discuss it in your review, as I’ve done here, and tell us all about why you think it was too much or too little. Just don’t dock a star over it, please. 🙂

The final “this thing was present” thing is the repeated use of “herstory” rather than “history”, furthering the myth that the etymology of “history” has any kind of male bias. Indeed, its earliest meanings simply meant “inquiry”, no matter who was doing the inquiring, and for centuries from the Greeks to the Romans and then the early French, the word was actually *feminine* within the language – “historia” in both Greek and Latin, and “histoire” in French. “Herstory” was actually developed as a neologism and pun barely 50 yrs ago during the heart of Second Wave feminism among the activist/ scholar set. So yes, for those with a modern activist feminist bent, perhaps you’ll appreciate that this neologism is used rather than the anciently feminine term. Others will find it perhaps a touch annoying, and at least a few will want to avoid this book knowing it is present at all. Again I stress: Read. This. Book. Anyway.

Even the “intolerance of the intolerant” – a concept I first saw argued most successfully in fiction in the late 90s in Frank Peretti’s The Prophet – is only really slightly more than a footnote here. Yes, the “intolerant” are absolutely used as foils to our heroes and yes, it drives the heroes in certain key ways and shows up at least a few times more than once, but again, it is more that “annoyance” level for some readers (that others even more insistent in their views will likely again want to defenestrate the book over) that still others will absolutely love this book for that very thing. Again: Read. This. Book. Anyway.

Remember earlier when I warned you that there would be a spoiler paragraph deep within the text of this review? Welcome to that paragraph. Those who do not want a major plot point spoiled should leave this paragraph now and simply pick up reading the next paragraph of this review. I guarantee you that after this paragraph we go back to minor-at-best and no-specifics discussions of the text. But I’m warning you right now one final time, the spoiler is coming up soon. You should skip to the next paragraph right now if you want to avoid it. Now, for those who want to know what the big spoiler is, well, the dog dies in the epilogue. That’s it. That’s the big spoiler. I’ll say no more about it, I’m just continuing this paragraph for a bit just to make sure it is well and truly buried within this paragraph such that it is as easily skippable as I can make a pure text review and in fact more skippable than many content warnings placed before the story begins in an eBook. Authors should place such content warnings on their websites instead, as in that manner those who want such warnings can easily find them and those who don’t can more easily skip them. It also allows the author the opportunity to update the list as societal preferences and tolerances change. I think this is sufficient for burying the spoiler, so now we’re moving back to the main text of the review.

There is no way to avoid dusty rooms in this book. They start early and only through the movement of the plot do we ever rise above them… yet with the dust hanging around chest level, just enough room for us to breathe a bit more clearly while doing the things we must. Grief and moving on is absolutely essential to this book, as well as love and community. There is a lot of bookstore commentary, particularly on the business side, and indeed at least some of the arguments that frequently go back and forth among booklandia and some of its subsets are present here as well – and they all combine both to help us all handle the grief and to work our way through it.

I’ve read a few books over the years that tackled grief and trying to do the best you can to move through it to varying degrees of success. To my mind, this is absolutely up there on the better end of that range. Maybe not approaching Without Remorse – but it also doesn’t have anywhere near the bodycount or baddassery… or the graphic and brutal violence (sexual and otherwise) of that particular tale. Still, of all the books I’m thinking of on this list from my direct experience, I really do think I would put this easily in the top 5 most powerful of its type, and thus why I keep telling you to read this book anyway, even if it has things that would otherwise annoy you, and yes, even with the events of the epilogue that will leave you utterly bawling as you close this book.

No matter where you are in life right now, this is absolutely one of those books that will come in handy at some point as you begin to get your mind ready for unfathomable tragedy that unfortunately strikes us all at some point in our lives, or perhaps the tragedy has already hit and you’re looking for your path out. I genuinely believe this is one of those books that can help in that situation as well.

Very much recommended.

This review of Dog Person by Camille Pagan was originally written on April 13, 2026.

#BookReview: The Last Seat by Jenifer Ruff

One Of The Most Spot-On Descriptions I’ve Ever Come Across. So despite having this as an ARC for at least a few weeks, specifically because Ruff is a Lead Author in the Facebook group My Book Friends – which I’ve been active in since its founding several years ago – I only got to it about a week after its release due to some real-life issues happening these last few weeks and continuing through Summer 2026 or so. And yet my review won’t have Goodreads’ discriminatory banner against Advance Review Copy reviews since my review is coming in a week late. And yet, at least as of the time I’m writing this review almost exactly as this book completes its first week of public availability, that description right now really is exactly what I say in the title here – one of the most spot on descriptions I’ve ever come across. Which is pretty awesome itself. It means I really don’t have to tell you much more about what to expect with this book.

Instead I’ll speak more directly to my own experience with the book, which I always make it a point to do anyway, and tell you that for me, this was a very quick and engaging read. Yes, at a hair over 300 pages it can seem long to some readers (and short to others), and in fact for its genre it is in the shorter half of books – yet Ruff manages to pack quite a bit of actual story in here, with Tony Stark’s quip about Nick Fury in the first Avengers movie – “his secrets have secrets” absolutely applying here. Which actually makes for a great quick read, one that right when any given thing starts getting anywhere near overstaying its welcome… bam! We’re moving on to something else.

Indeed, the only thing that I could really nitpick on about this book is that at least some of the revelations and twists don’t really seem to have any hints or breadcrumbs *at all*, and yes, I subscribe to the idea that *every* twist should have at least *some* level of foreshadowing. Instead, we get a version of a tale from a song that first hit number one over 5o yrs ago and then was done as a *cover* (as I only found out when writing this review!) that became a Southern staple nearly 20 yrs after its original recording. (In perhaps a bit of tragic history that at least to Southern kids of the 80s such as myself, this cover becoming a hit when it did meant at least *I* never knew of the original version of the song!) But this is as close as I’ll get to naming this song in the review, and perhaps there are some of my own readers who can piece these clues together well enough. (I guarantee you it will make a lot of sense once you read this book and then look for songs that meet my clues above based on what you find in the text. 😉 )

Ultimately this really is one of those books that reads faster than its not-that-long page count would suggest, which is awesome for those who are perhaps trying to squeeze reading in to whatever nooks and crannies they can find in their schedule. (Lines. Take your Kindle or even Kindle app on your phone in lines. You’re standing there anyway. May as well read instead of doomscrolling. You’ll be much happier. 😉 )

Very much recommended.

This review of The Last Seat by Jenifer Ruff was originally written on April 10, 2026.

#BookReview: Where The False Gods Dwell by Denny S. Bryce

Strong (Historical) Women’s Fiction Ends As A Breathtaking Thriller. First, I got this Advance Review Copy in a somewhat unusual manner – via winning Bryce’s contest in the annual Great Big Giveaway Day 2025 hosted by the Facebook group Readers Coffeehouse, which I’ve been a member of for quite some time and actively assist the Founders (Steena Holmes, Laura Drake, Cathy Lamb, Barbara Claypole White, Kimberly Belle, and Catherine Ryan Hyde) with every year via tracking all the books and winners in all the contests along with my partner in that effort, Ann Marie McKeon Gruszkowski. This is something that I have a lot of fun with every year and find a lot of new books at every year, and I encourage all readers and authors to give it a look. On the version of this review on my blog, BookAnon.com, and my SubStack, I’ll link the document of all the participating authors and books from the 2025 contest here. So I’ve actually had this copy since September 2025, and yet because of just how many ARCs I read… I only managed to get to it the day before release. Yikes!

Now, onto the book itself: Y’all, it is *really* good. Through most of the story, it is a women’s fiction set in 1935 in the heart of the Great Depression and only shortly after Prohibition ended in the United States and it features characters that are in situations all too universally felt, allowing far too many people to relate to at least one of its central characters all too well.

Starting in both Chicago and Jamaica, this is indeed a tale with multiple character perspectives, though these are primarily just our three central characters as they begin to be set on paths that will have them meet up and then change each others’ lives forever. For those who are generally hostile towards multi-perspective dramas, this one probably won’t change your mind. Give it a shot, if you’re willing, but while this tale is done well in this style, I’m not sure that it will move the needle for those particular readers. For everyone else though, and specifically for those who *do* enjoy the multi-perspective style of storytelling, this is one tale where it is used truly effectively throughout the entire tale – including showing the same scene through different perspectives at least a couple of different times, one of which in particular was done in a manner reminiscent of the best of the Now You See Me movie sequences.

For those looking for more of a hurricane/ survival story… that comes in more at the tail end here – within the last 20% of the tale, and indeed closing out the tale before the epilogue a year later. So while it isn’t a primary focus of the book, it is foreshadowed well in a couple of places (in hindsight), and when it hits, it *hits* and is done on par with some of the best sequences I’ve ever read, particularly for women’s fiction/ historical tales to the point of the hurricane.

Now, one thing that will absolutely turn off at least some readers – to the point of defenestration likely or perhaps even imminent – is that this particular tale is *very* pro-union (the worker’s collective type, to be clear). So just know that up front, and if that is something that you just can’t handle, even in a fictional tale, eh, maybe skip this one. You’re only doing yourself a disservice there because this really is a great tale well told even with this focus, but at least if you truly have such strong opinions about that particular facet and skip it because I told you about this, maybe I can spare Bryce a scathing 1 star review because of your own hangups. 🙂

Overall truly a powerful tale solidly told, one that may well stick with some readers long after they’ve finished reading the words on these pages.

Very much recommended.

This review of Where The False Gods Dwell by Denny S. Bryce was originally written on February 24, 2026.

#BookReview: The Great River by Boyce Upholdt

Nothing Technically Wrong – Yet Your Mileage Will Absolutely Vary. This is one of those books where there is nothing technically wrong – even the bibliography clocks in at a healthy 30% or so – and yet with the way Upholdt chooses to write this book… eh, a lot of people are going to have a lot of problems with it.

The book does a decent enough job of going through (at a very high level, mostly) the breadth of the history of the Mississippi, particularly as it relates to human interaction with the river, from the earliest of “Native American” (themselves recent immigrants, at this point in history) all the way forward into 2020s era issues. But make no mistake, if you’re looking for a more geography-based examination of the river… this really ain’t that. Instead, this is far more of an engineering look at the engineering challenges of living amidst the river and shaping it – as much as possible – to human needs of the given era… no matter how ill-advised or not quite thought through or understood those efforts to shape it may have been in any given era.

One large point of contention here, for many, is the “less than straight” narrative flow, as Upholdt may be talking about 19th century efforts (or even 2020s efforts) and suddenly be doing a deep dive into ancient efforts either using an earlier tech or perhaps in the same area of the river. Similarly, we may be in New Orleans and suddenly jump to Chicago or St Louis or vice versa. These jumps worked reasonably enough for my own mind, but I also fully admit my own (Autistic) mind is very different than many, and not everyone will be able to follow such jumps with such ease.

I think, for me, the largest point of contention for my own personal tastes was Upholdt’s prevalent and pervasive denigration of anything good about Western and/ or white efforts within the River, getting quite preachy at times about how other societies’ efforts were “better” in some way or another according to his own tastes. No, I’m not defending in any way actual evil and vile actions that anyone of any race did along the Mississippi – humans are idiots in the best of times, and across all of humanity across all of time, there will always be people behaving nobly and people behaving abhorrently no matter their demographics. My issue with Upholdt’s commentary is simply that he routinely excuses the bad in every other group while highlighting the bad in Western/ white people and ideas.

But maybe my reading of the text was off and you don’t see any of that. Maybe my reading was spot on and you see it – but agree with Upholdt’s views on the topics at hand. As I said in the beginning, your mileage is absolutely going to vary on this book.

If you’re interested in the history of human engineering as it relates to the Mississippi River, you’re ultimately going to find this book at least somewhat enjoyable no matter your particular beliefs about any given topic, though there may indeed be sections where nearly anyone will also want to rapidly defenestrate it at the closest available opportunity. Read the book for yourself, decide for yourself what you think of it, and write up your own review of it. Feel free to call me out in your review if you truly think I deserve it. Just read the book for yourself if you think it is something you might be interested in and write your own review when you finish it. (Or even if you DNF it, write your own review noting where and why in the text you decided to DNF.)

Recommended.

This review of The Great River by Boyce Upholdt was originally written on December 28, 2024.

#BookReview: Unforgiving Places by Jens Ludwig

Wherein Academia Catches Up To Eminem And Dr. Dre. First up, I gotta give Ludwig credit here, the text is 41% bibliography, which is truly remarkable – on the higher end of any book I’ve ever read. So, truly, kudos. No matter what those sources may say, the fact that they were so prevalent throughout the text is a good thing where I come from – at worst, it is crystal clear the information being used to present the narrative.

And before we get into the meat of the review, I do need to note that Ludwig’s reliance on the terms “System 1” and “System 2”, while perhaps academically accurate… also makes his arguments less clear and concise, as one has to constantly remember what “System 1” and “System 2” mean. So for this review, I’m going to do what Ludwig should have done and refer to them as “Automatic” and “Thinking”.

Basically, Ludwig’s entire point is that gun violence is not a question of “bad people” – as he claims the GOP likes to proclaim (in a fair amount of straw man, but perhaps with some valid enough straws) or of “bad environments” – as he claims the Democrats like to proclaim (in a similar amount of straw man/ straws), but rather *bad decision making*. Ummm…. duh, doc. From there, Ludwig’s entire premise centralizes on disrupting the Automatic action and forcing the person about to commit gun violence – be it murder or suicide – to *think* about what they’re about to do and whether they really want to do it.

So this entire 352 page book that clocks in at 41% documentation is essentially a long way of saying exactly what Eminem and Dr. Dre said in Guilty Conscience over 20 years ago.

Ludwig does in fact lay out the arguments in a very systematic, academic manner. Though he *does* rely *way* too much on Chicago, the *very* place most Americans think of as having the *worst* problem with gun violence in the entire country (and as Ludwig himself admits in the text, having perhaps only the second worst gang problem in the country, IF it is behind LA’s gang problem in any given year). But given that at least one recurring example used in the narrative is the doc walking his own dog… maybe there are reasons Ludwig didn’t look too much further afield.

But seriously, read the book. Maybe it will help crystallize in your own mind exactly what Ludwig does throughout the text: the arguments and policies of the last century clearly aren’t really moving the needle on the issue, so perhaps it is time for new ways of thinking. Of finding ways that disrupt the Automatic system and instead force individuals into the Thinking mode for even 10 minutes (or up to 3 hrs or so, in the case of suicide attempts, apparently).

Maybe if enough politicians read the book, maybe if Barack Obama or Bill Gates put it on their 2025 reading lists, maybe more people will consider these thoughts, and maybe things might actually get better.

Maybe if we’d listened to Eminem and Dre 20 yrs ago, we might have already been there.

Very much recommended.

This review of Unforgiving Places by Jens Ludwig was originally written on December 22, 2024.

#BlogTour: The Greatest Lie Of All by Jillian Cantor

For this blog tour, we’re looking at . For this blog tour, we’re looking at The Greatest Lie Of All by Jillian Cantor.

First, the review I posted to the book sites (BookHype.com / BookBub.com / TheStoryGraph.com / Goodreads.com):

Never Meet Your Heroes – You Might Find Out More Than You Wanted To. Seriously, this book takes that age old saying to heart in its basic premise… and then spins it on its head in the actual execution of the tale at hand and in showing all that has transpired in these characters’ lives.

This is one of those inventive enough tales that it seems almost completely implausible… and yet real enough that it feels all too real at the same damn time. Surely, *nothing* could be *this* convoluted, right? (Says the guy whose mother in law is best friends with her husband’s ex-wife and whose grandparents lived together on the same property – at times even in the same house – even after they divorced and remarried.) In other words… yes, life can get quite messy at times, and this book does a tremendous job of showing this to great dramatic effect.

This is one of those women’s fiction/ romance genre benders that actually has the *cajones* to walk right up to the RWA/ RNA gatekeepers and say “Really? You’re going to try to tell me that *this* isn’t a romance for the ages?”. There is even at least one element of this book that will certainly, if the book reaches enough people, prove quite controversial indeed, and while I know *exactly* what those arguments will be and who (in general) will be making them, revealing even the specific nature of that particular debate pretty well spoils what this element is, so this is about as close as I can get to noting its presence without spoiling it.

Releasing late in the year when Yankees are seemingly already snowed under and largely inside their might-as-well-be Igloos for the winter and thus needing much reading material (at least that is how this Southern boy who has never lived any further north than the Atlanta exurbs tends to look at these things), this is going to be one of those great ones to read while huddled up trying to stay warm. Yes, even for us Floridians in our heaviest Arctic gear getting ready for temperatures that begin with “5” for a few days.

Very much recommended.

After the jump, an excerpt from the book followed by the “publisher details” – book info, description, author bio, social links, and buy links.
Continue reading “#BlogTour: The Greatest Lie Of All by Jillian Cantor”

#BlogTour: Sleeping With The Frenemy by Natalie Cana

For this blog tour, we’re looking at a tale that is necessarily different from its predecessors in its series. For this blog tour, we’re looking at Sleeping With The Frenemy by Natalie Cana.

First, the review I posted to the book sites (BookHype.com / BookBub.com / TheStoryGraph.com / Goodreads.com):

Very Different From Previous Books. Still Solid In Its Own Right. The first two books in this series dealt with vastly different types of relationships than our MCs here have. In the first book, it was a friends to lovers situation, while in the second book it was a S L O W burn second chance situation. Here, its more of a situation situation. As in, this is a couple that has been fucking for *years* behind the backs of the siblings of one of them – one of those siblings being the best friend of the other. More on a situational level though – both were available and attracted to each other and had an opportunity, so mutual itch scratching was had. Fair enough, and that back story alone makes this *wildly* different than the other books here.

And because of that back story, this is perhaps the spiciest entry into the series. So those looking for the no sex/ “fade to black” type books… this aint fucking that. Instead, it more readily takes scenes from a Fifty Shades type environment, and that alone should tell most anyone what to generally expect there.

Still, this book and these characters have history within the series, and that is well respected here. The characters from the prior entries all show up in appropriate enough places, and indeed certain elements of prior storylines come into play heavily in this book – so absolutely read this series in order.

Overall a fun, spicy, story whose every element blends the Puerto Rican background of these characters with their current Chicago home quite well. Very much recommended.

After the jump, an excerpt from the book followed by the “publisher details” – book info, description, author bio, social links, and buy links.
Continue reading “#BlogTour: Sleeping With The Frenemy by Natalie Cana”

#BookReview: Cities In The Sky by Jason M. Barr

Solid And Seemingly Comprehensive Examination Of The Topic. This is a book that takes a look at the ever-evolving quest to build the world’s tallest skyscrapers, from its origins in the 19th century (and the debate over who first created what) all the way through Summer 2023, when the book was being written. Along the way we learn of various periods of American skyscraper construction – yes, including Sears Tower, the Empire State Building, the World Trade Center towers, and others. But we *also* get just as detailed a view of skyscraper construction in other areas of the world and how each builds on advances in the other locations as time progresses. We visit the Middle East and learn of its mega projects. We visit Hong Kong in both the Colonial and Chinese eras. We visit Taiwan and China and see how their standoff plays out in their construction efforts. Along the way, we get the histories and economics of how and why such structures are wanted and what makes them profitable – hint, it isn’t always the rents they generate from tenants. We even get a solid examination of the arguments for and against such structures, along with the (seemingly requisite in this type of book) predictions for the future and a few suggestions for how to make those predictions become reality.

Overall truly an interesting book, well written for the average reader – yes, there is some jargon, but Barr does a solid job of using it sparingly and explaining it reasonably well when he does. Also reasonably well documented, clocking in at 20% of the text of the Advance Review Copy edition I read.

Very much recommended.

This review of Cities In The Sky by Jason M. Barr was originally written on April 27, 2024.

#BlogTour: A Dish Best Served Hot by Natalie Cana

For this blog tour, we’re looking at the spicy second entry in Natalie Cana’s series of family, friends,… and a meddling grandfather. For this blog tour, we’re looking at A Dish Best Served Hot by Natalie Cana.

Here’s what I had to say on the review sites (TheStoryGraph, BookHype, Goodreads):

Slow Burn Second Chance Romance With Quite A Bit Of Political Commentary Baked In. Straight up, just from the nature of the work of our female MC in particular, this book has *quite* a bit of left leaning politics baked in. That noted, if you can accept that this is simply this character… it actually isn’t overly preachy. I’ve certainly seen *far* more preachy books given similar characters in other works by other authors before, so, truly – don’t let that scare you too much, just know your eyes may roll a bit if you disagree with the politics being espoused.

Beyond that though, this really is a solid and remarkably deep second chance/ single dad romance showing the power of love… and meddling grandfathers and saccharine sweet young daughters. But it *is* a *very* slow burn, almost with more focus on everything *other* than the romance itself. Like, our MCs met in HS and had this instant chemistry, broke it off, went their separate ways, and yet the flame never died… so it is never really *shown* in the book so much as *told* that it is there (with the *occasional* view of it, often seeming more to remind the reader that this *is* intended to be a romance novel).

And yet… the story really does work quite well. There’s nothing definitively *wrong* with it, and the world created here is remarkably “real” and one of the more fully fleshed out communities I’ve encountered in all of my reading. It just may not be *exactly* the kind of book various readers are looking for for various reasons. Including pissing off the sweet/ clean crowd with its in-the-room sex scenes.

Still, ultimately this *was* a really good book. I *am* looking forward to Book 3. And this *is* very much recommended.

After the jump, an excerpt from the book followed by the “publisher details” – book excerpt, book description, author bio, and social media and buy links.
Continue reading “#BlogTour: A Dish Best Served Hot by Natalie Cana”