Tag: nonfiction

Posted on

#BookReview: The Last Hart Beating by Nattie Neidhart

Among The Best Wrestling Memoirs Ever Written. I’ve been reading wrestling memoirs roughly as long as Niedhart has been a professional wrestler – beginning roughly in 2001 when we were both in our late teens, maybe slightly earlier – whenever Mick Foley’s first book hit mass market paperback. And yes, I’ve read both of Foley’s early books. I’ve read at least one of Jericho’s books, I’ve read Batista’s book and at least one of HBK’s books. I even read The Rock’s dad (“Soulman” Rocky Johnson)’s book and Hornswoggle’s book. More recently, I’ve read Rousey’s 2024 book along with Lynch’s book released at nearly the same time. Earlier this year, I had a chance to do an Advance Review Copy of Killer Kross’s book that released about a month ago as I write this review.

In other words, I have a lot of experience reading wrestler’s memoirs, though there are still several I’ve yet to get to.

And y’all, I absolutely put this one right up there among the top.

This one is full of everything that makes a good wrestling memoir great – the history, the peeks behind the scenes at various points and from Niedhart’s view from whatever age she was at the time growing up, her own story from the first time she ever picked up The Anvil’s championship belt through becoming a multi-time Champion within WWE herself. We see more of her struggles with her dad than even Total Divas really had any capacity of showing. We see her fears – shared by fellow third generation Superstar who also wrote a forward to this book, “some kid named Dwayne” (as Soulman said in his book) – of whether she could live up to her family’s legacy. We see how that legacy shaped both the woman and the professional Neidhart has become – for good and not so great. We even get a friends to lovers romance for the ages that few even fictional romance authors can replicate, showing the first time TJ first showed up at Hart House through their struggles together when he broke his neck in the ring and beyond.

This book seems very transparent – yes, many of us thought we knew Niedhart particularly from Total Divas (though as with all “reality” shows, that one became quite obviously *barely anything resembling reality* rather quickly, particularly after the first season), but here we see even more of her story, particularly her absolute love and admiration for her dad… and all the heartache this caused as his mental condition deteriorated over the years.

Bookending with the 2019 WWE Hall of Fame Induction of Neidart’s uncle Bret ‘The Hitman’ Hart and her dad Jim ‘The Anvil’ Niedhart as The Hart Foundation seems a deliberate editorial choice, a way to stop before the pandemic / “Thunderdome” era of WWE… and perhaps lay the groundwork for a later memoir to pick up exactly there, ala Foley, Jericho, and even HBK’s follow-up books?

Wrestling fans of any stripe are going to love this book. There’s simply too much history here for you not to, including Niedhart’s own interactions with one Vincent Kennedy McMahon, Jr over the years. More than that though, this is going to be one for a lot more people. For the Millennial cat moms – yes, Niedhart briefly touches on why she chose not to have human children. For the woman afraid to stand up for herself in her own career – Niedhart shows that even with a legendary legacy in your industry behind you, standing up for yourself is still daunting, but sometimes absolutely must be done. For those interested in women in sports – Niedhart shows the path she made through some family connections but also several shit tons of hard ass work… and a bit of luck even, at times.

Very much recommended.

This review of The Last Hart Beating by Nattie Neidhart was originally written on September 6, 2025.

Posted on

#BookReview: The Killing Age by Clifton Crais

Flawed Premise And Weirdly Exacting Time Selection Move Interesting Premise To Garbage Narrative. This is one of those books that I *wanted* to like. I *strongly* believe, based on my own historical studies over the years, that there is a truly strong case to be made for how violence has shaped the modern world in ways that most humans alive today simply aren’t aware of. There is a case to be made for how violence and conquest shape almost literally every facet of everything we currently know, up to and including the most bleeding edge sciences all largely having their origins in military research and applications – including all of computing and very nearly everything we as humanity are doing both in astronomy and in particle physics.

Unfortunately, this book doesn’t even begin to attempt to make that case.

Instead, this is yet another anti-capitalist polemic wherein a “historian” attempts to reframe history… and yet provides a bibliography one would typically expect from a more mundane and well trod “this is what happened at this event” type history book. In other words, it is *far* from meeting the Sagan Standard of “extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence”. And yet, at roughly 22% bibliography (in addition to several more pages of front matter listing many dozens of people and events covered in the text), this text sufficiently meets my 20-30% documentation expectations for nonfiction books generally, so actually doesn’t lose a star there. Note even here though that while there is technically enough bibliography, it is also extremely cherry picked to show exactly the narrative Crais is trying to frame without ever even hinting at other possible interpretations of the events at hand.

No, the two star deductions are distinct enough (in my mind at least) to warrant two separate deductions, but also linked in that they form the basis of how Crais approaches his entire narrative.

For one, Crais blames all of captialism’s rise on slavery… without even going into the 20th century to try to frame the various labor debates there as also slavery or even including the rise of mass incarceration or fast fashion or any other well known labor abuses as also slavery, choosing to instead end his narrative at the end of the 19th century. Thus, even though Great Britain ended slavery relatively early in the time period Crais does choose to focus on and the US fought a civil war near the end of it to force the end of slavery… Crais still blames all of capitalism’s ills on, according to him, capitalism being based on slavery and absolutely nothing else.

For another, and yes, I hinted at this above, Crais is oddly specific in his choice of time period and even areas of focus, choosing to examine only Great Britain and the United States and to begin specifically in 1750 with the publication of Adam Smith’s The Wealth of Nations and end at the end of the 19th century, well before capitalism *really* took off… and yet also before communism caused the deaths of literally millions of people itself… often via direct State violence. This odd specificity allows Crais to openly ignore other violences even within the period he chooses to examine, such as the Napoleonic Wars.

There is great promise in a book that truly and fully explores the history of human violence in its totality and shows how that violence has created and shaped our modern world as we know it.

I simply wish Crais had made even a modicum of an attempt at writing such a history. Perhaps this book would have been better with a different title and more honest and specific premise?

Not recommended.

This review of The Killing Age by Clifton Crais was originally written on September 6, 2025.

Posted on

#BookReview: Empire Of Deterrence by Michael Gardiner

Academic Meta-Analysis Of The Fall Of Nuclear Terror As Primary Societal Scare In The United Kingdom. First off, this is both quite short and quite well documented – clocking in at just 175 or so pages and 34% or so documentation in the Advance Review Copy I read weeks before publication. So it absolutely has that going for it, for any reader. 🙂

As to the subject, Gardiner does a remarkable – and remarkably focused – job of taking the reader through the last 70 ish years of British entertainment/ zeitgeist history and showing how while once (during the Cold War and its immediate aftermath) nuclear terror was a driver in the overall consciousness of the British people, of late those concerns have become a background as the populace is more focused on other issues, including immigration and difficulties caused by it.

Gardiner, appearing based on the text here to be a Scotsman and perhaps even a member of the Scottish National Party – whom he refers to favorably in several instances herein and with whom he seems to share a focus on the UK’s Trident nuclear missile program (apparently based primarily in Scotland?) -, clearly doesn’t like the lack of focus on the nuclear threat, seeing it as a looming threat even now that, according to him, eclipses all other concerns even today.

Even with the excellent documentation here, I don’t feel that Gardiner was convincing in his arguments, but that could well be a “me” thing. To me, it seems that he is glossing over quite a few very real concerns in his exacting focus on “the nuclear threat is *THE* primary existential threat we face!!!”.

(To be clear, I am an American from the Southern US whose every traceable-so-far ancestor was in the US for the last 150 or so years, but who largely came from either Great Britain or Ireland before that. (And yes, here I said “Great Britain” quite intentionally – to date, I’ve traced none of them to Scotland itself.) While I am very familiar with US politics, certainly this Millennium, I readily admit to being only extremely vaguely familiar with UK politics. To the level that a UK reader may find much more here to agree or disagree with than I have, and may quite likely find this review to be quite idiotic.)

Overall this is an interesting enough look into an area I hadn’t really considered beforehand, and with its brevity works well for those open to nonfiction who are looking for a rather short, rather quick read. Indeed, I seem to have read this book in barely a couple of hours, as a rough benchmark for what you might expect here.

Very much recommended.

This review of Empire Of Deterrence by Michael Gardiner was originally written on August 28, 2025.

Posted on

#BookReview: The Invention Of Rum by Jordan B. Smith

Solid Examination Of The Topic. I’ve read books before where when you read the publisher’s description of the book and then read the book, you wonder what whoever within the publisher actually wrote that description was smoking… and if you can get your hands on some of that clearly mind altering stuff.

This book is *not* that. Instead, here the publisher’s description as I write this review nearly three weeks before publication is truly spot on exactly what you’re getting here – all the way down to the fact that this is very clearly a 2020s Academia level book both in styling and in what it emphasizes.

The overall writing here is a touch dry and absolutely more dense than the casual reader will likely prefer, and yet it is still a very readable tome in the same way that fruitcake is technically edible and lead is great for many applications… and not so great for others.

Thus, if you’re interested in a detailed history of exactly how this particular spirit came to be and how it became such a sought-after commodity in its era (and how it helped actively create markets in said era, along with spawning at least a few idioms known even today), this is absolutely going to be a book to pick up. You’re going to learn a *lot*, and you may be a hit at Rum Trivia.

If you’re a more casual reader looking for a history of an alcohol related topic to perhaps read while sipping your favorite refreshment at the beach (because here in Florida, we truly have (nearly) Endless Summer) or perhaps while overlooking the changing fall colors (as this book will be published in mid September, when if I remember correctly some leaves in more northern areas start to turn) from your porch with a fire burning in the fireplace… this book may be a touch too dense, but certainly close enough to at least use the “Look Inside” feature on Amazon to get an idea of how the prose works for your own tastes.

Overall truly a solid and well documented (roughly 29% of the Advance Review Copy edition I read, right around the upper range of what I consider normal in that regard) look at the liquor, its history, and its impact on history, with just a few brief mentions of anything beyond the 19th century in the closing notes of the epilogue. Well worth the read for anyone, even as realistically I know it will mostly be read by actual historians and academics or perhaps others with strong professional interests or perhaps hyper-fixations on the topic.

Very much recommended.

This review of The Invention Of Rum by Jordan B. Smith was originally written on August 24, 2025.

Posted on

#BookReview: Stones Still Speak by Amanda Hope Haley

The Publisher Used The Perfect Review Tagline! I’m not joking on that headline either. As I write this review just over a month before this book publishes, the very first line of the current description of this book says “Untangling the Sunday School Stories You Learned from the Biblical History You Haven’t”. And dammit, had they not used that line, *I WOULD HAVE!*.

That book is the singular **PERFECT** way to describe this book in a succinct manner. It really is exactly what you’re getting here.

In this book, an actual field archaeologist goes through the Bible nearly cover to cover showing what the field of archaeology has discovered… and what it hasn’t. Written from an unequivocally Christian perspective, this is a book that doesn’t try to destroy faith – and yet also actively debunks claims that the evidence simply can’t support, even while fully acknowledging and even actively embracing the supernatural in instances where there is wiggle room. (Absence of evidence not being evidence of absence and all that jazz. 😉 )

In many of my reviews of Christian books I’ve deducted a star for prooftexting, and while Haley does in fact cite Bible verses frequently throughout this text… she never actually engages in that practice. Indeed, she cites the verse specifically to place it *within* its context both Biblically and historically and archaeologically. Thus, she’s actually doing quite the *opposite* of prooftexting, even while employing a similar mechanism.

No, the star deduction here is simply the dearth of the bibliography, clocking in at just 8% or so of the text I have in my Advance Review Copy – vs the roughly double that that would be an acceptable (ish) minimum per the documentation standards of other nonfiction books I’ve read over the years. (And indeed, many of the remaining nonfiction ARCs I have clock in at or north of 30% documentation, a few even hitting the 40% and above mark!)

Overall though, this really is a particularly strong book that may potentially be controversial for the hyper religious (both Christians and those who oppose anything remotely related to Christianity), but is well within the Overton Window for most readers. The writing style is very approachable, far from the dense and dusty academy-speak one might fear they would be getting into here, and thus truly very much approachable for most any reader capable of reading chapter books at all.

Very much recommended.

This review of Stones Still Speak by Amanda Hope Haley was originally written on August 22, 2025.

Posted on

#BookReview: Rope by Tim Queeney

Solid Examination Of The Topic. This is a book written by a sailor that goes deep into all things rope, including its earliest known histories through to its future uses as currently known and planned. We get a *lot* of history from eras from prehistory through Egypt and the Greeks through the Age of Exploration (and even some about the Chinese exploration expeditions) through rope’s uses in executions both sanctioned by governments and not all the way into bleeding edge rope tech taking us into the future of humanity. Through this narrative, I guarantee you that you are going to learn at least something you didn’t previously know – I know I did. I appreciated that the chapter titles were themed to the idea of individual strands in a piece of rope, as that was both perfect theming and a great way of organizing and thinking about the overall history being presented.

Ultimately, this book had two weaknesses for me, though only one worthy of a star deduction. The other, simply a discussion here in the review – a warning, really, to other readers who may be less prepared for it.

The warning is that Queeney *is* a sailor and *really* knows his rope – and knots. He can get quite technical, particularly when he’s talking about how to rig ropes for sailing – which is a significant topic in the book. Through these sections, I recommend the literary/ reading equivalent of the social “nod and ‘uh huh'” when someone is talking about some passion that you’re interested in, but clearly nowhere near as interested in as they are. Read every word – don’t skim it – but allow yourself to not focus on “I must remember every detail of this!”.

Outside of these hyper detailed sections though (and even within them, really), the book really is quite well written and very fascinating indeed in all that it reveals. I’m not joking whatsoever when I mentioned above that even I learned from this book. I really did. Quite a bit that I had never even considered previously. So absolutely go into this book preparing to learn more about this particular subject than at any time since you left formal schooling, whenever that may have been for you.

The star deduction is for the dearth of a bibliography, coming in at 12% or so of the text – still over 30 pages of documented sources in a book of this length, to be clear – which falls just short of even my relaxed-ish standard of 15% and further short of the 20-30% documentation I had been expecting earlier in my reviewing efforts several years ago.

So… that’s it. That’s the review. Go read this book, even if you had never considered the topic and don’t necessarily want to learn anything new. Because this book may be hyper focused, but that actually *increases* its overall quality and ultimately usefulness.

Very much recommended.

This review of Rope by Tim Queeney was originally written on August 12, 2025.

Posted on

#BookReview: Beyond Control by Jacob Sullum

Strong Refutation of Gun and Drug Laws. At least in American politics, the political right loves to demand total freedom re: guns (and has a particularly strong textual Constitutional case for exactly that) yet also demand exceedingly harsh punishments for even minor issues wherein a person is using, possessing, or even being anywhere near some substance the government has decided it doesn’t like. In American politics, the political left is the opposite – demanding near total freedom re: substances (despite, to be clear, a clear Constitutional case protecting access there) while demanding ever more draconian punishments for any issue they don’t like involving certain tools they don’t like.

In this text, reasonably well researched with a bibliography clocking in at around 23% of the overall text, Reason Magazine editor Jacob Sullum finally writes a book about the two issues he has spent a career writing for the magazine about: gun control and drug control, and how both have remarkably similar histories and even current arguments.

Sullum shows how both ultimately come from racist and classist origins and actively have racist and classist causes and effects even in today’s society. He quotes the oft-cited Michelle Alexander’s New Jim Crow, while pointing to some of its shortcomings. He cites others across the ideological spectrum, showing the strengths and weaknesses of several different ideas through the course of both early American history up through history as recent as 2024.

Ultimately, this is not even that arguably the strongest take down of both regulatory schemes I’ve yet encountered in book form – and the fact that Sullum did it with *two* topics (and shows how closely they are linked, despite “both” American Political Parties handling each very differently) at once shows just how much of a master logician he is. I mean, I consider myself reasonably well versed in various forms of debate, but here Sullum may as well be Neo upon discovering that he really is The One, effortlessly slicing through counter arguments as if they were no more substantive than the hot air coming out both sides of Joe Biden’s mouth. (And yes, yet again another libertarian-based book, and another book were former US Senator and now former President Joe Biden is cited – and showing how wrong he was – seemingly more often than any other US President, including the current one as I write this review just over a month before publication of this book. The other similar book being Radley Balko’s excellent 2013 book Rise Of The Warrior Cop.)

If you’re at all interested in gun control or drug legalization in the US, from any position and any angle… you need to read this book. Even if just for opposition research. Because even if I didn’t agree with Sullum’s positions (and I don’t… maybe 5% of the time here 😉 ) this truly is a very solidly reasoned and examined argument against government regulation of either object, at least as regulations of either currently stand or are largely even thought of at all, and even if you are 100% opposed to Sullum’s stances here, you’ll do yourself a favor by examining his arguments if only to try to find a way to counter them.

Truly well done, truly well organized narratively, and absolutely…

Very much recommended.

This review of Beyond Control by Jacob Sullum was originally written on July 31, 2025.

Posted on

#BookReview: God Is On Your Side by Joshua Ryan Butler

Max Lucado-Style Examination Of John. With a title like this, the easy assumptions are that the book is going to be some kind of fluffy bullshit “self help” slop that never actually helps anyone or that it is going to be so “inclusive” of everything that it excuses everything and just make everyone feel better about themselves, no matter how horrible they may be.

Except that is about as far from what we actually get here as is possible to be.

What we actually get here is an insightful look through the Gospel of John that shows elements both of the Gospel as a whole and of specific stories herein that even I, who have studied this Gospel extensively throughout my own 42 years and counting and even preached my one “official” sermon on one of the very passages Butler spends a chapter walking us through in this text, had never known before. Even Lucado, for all his awesomeness, hasn’t exposed some of the elements of these stories and this book the way Butler does here, at least not in anything I’ve read from Lucado. (Though Lucado *does* have an even stronger look at what was going on at the Feast of Tabernacles, in a vivid description I’ll never forget and have often retold…even though I don’t remember which of Lucado’s books it came from.)

Butler exposes here more clearly than I’ve ever seen anywhere just how much the Gospel of John was written explicitly to show people just how much God loves them, in a way that the people – particularly his fellow Jews – of the era would understand much more deeply than is obvious millennia later and in a completely different language and far different culture. In revealing all of this rich detail, he does for the overall Gospel exactly what Lucado did for the Feast of Tabernacles – he makes it *so much more real and vivid*. Even as someone who truly has studied this very text off and on almost literally since he could read at all – I’m fairly certain John 3:16 “For God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten son that whosoever believes in Him shall not perish but shall have everlasting life” was literally one of the first things I could read at all, growing up in Sunday School and the Church nearly as much as I was in public school -, Butler reveals elements that make the book so much more alive even *for me*. Details like the entire structure of the book being a common way to structure Jewish tales even as far back as the time of Moses, that the frequent references to time were as much about story as about connecting those particular stories to particular periods of Holy Week / Passover – the days when Christ made His ultimate sacrifice. These are literary details that one may expect a Southern Baptist church to gloss over, perhaps, but I even took a Junior level collegiate class in Scriptural Literature as an elective in college and never learned this! Granted, this was a public college and not even a private school, much less an actual Seminary, but still! *Scriptural*. *Literature.*, and I didn’t learn about this *literary* technique! I had to learn about it over 20 yrs later in a random book by some preacher most people have never heard of!

Now, about the assumption at the top that this would be some kind of bullshit that excuses everything? Nah, Butler aint about that. Butler was pilloried barely two years ago for his book Beautiful Union: How God’s Vision for Sex Points Us to the Good, Unlocks the True, and (Sort of) Explains Everything, because he *dared* look at all aspects of sex from a Biblical, conservative Christian viewpoint. He got a *lot* of fire over that book, including one “reviewer” infamously going in and rating any book with his name attached to it at one star on Goodreads, even a book literally titled at the time “Untitled [I forget the year number here now] Joshua Ryan Butler Book”, which given when I saw that she had done this, I suspect he hadn’t even started writing yet at that moment! Yet here Butler references the exact same take on these same issues and has similar types of takes on many more.

And yet, like Lucado, Butler aint exactly about making people feel judged either. He’s not going to hesitate to call out sin… but he also does it in a caring manner that makes it clear that we are *all* sinners in need of grace, he more than any of us.

If you don’t like Christians or anything to do with Christianity… why are you reading a book that literally has the name of Jesus in the subtitle? Seriously, if you’re that bent out of shape for whatever reason – and maybe there is legitimate trauma there even… just ignore this book. If there is trauma there, get the help you need for it. But don’t bother reading this book until you do, because it is just going to piss you off – it is literally a book that talks about Christ on every single page, and you’re not ready for that. If you’re this type of person, just ignore the book – don’t bother reading it, and because you’re not going to read it, don’t be like that other asshole I told the story of above and rate one star something you never actually read. Yes, I know, it gives you that dopamine hit for a minute or two, but that’s it, just a shallow high that you’ll need something else to get that feeling in five minutes.

For those more open to Christianity – again, for whatever reason, even at just a comparative religions type level – check this one out. Even if you don’t agree with Butler’s takes on sin and the various societal and personal issues he discusses here, like I noted above, there’s a lot of legitimate learning here that even I didn’t previously know, despite my own extensive studies of this particular text. I might even go so far as to say that even if you have some Doctorate level degree specifically on the Gospel of John… there’s probably *something* in here even you wouldn’t be aware of.

Read this book, then write a review and let the rest of us know your own experience with it. This has been mine, and I’m interested to see what yours is like.

Oh, and that star deduction despite everything I’ve said above? As with so many others – even Lucado, maybe *especially* Lucado – there is rampant proof texting (citing Bible verses out of context as “proof” of some argument) here, even in a book whose overall narrative structure is walking through a single book of the Bible. I wage a war on this practice, and my only real “weapon” in that war is a star deduction on every review I write where the book uses it.

Very much recommended.

This review of God Is On Your Side by Joshua Ryan Butler was originally written on July 31, 2025.

Posted on

#BookReview: Mailman by Stephen Starring Grant

Inverted Hillbilly Elegy. That really is the easiest way to have a general idea about this book. Take nearly everything about Hillbilly Elegy, invert it, and you have a pretty solid approximation of Grant’s thinking. Told as a native of the eastern/ southern side of Appalachia rather than the western/ northern side, this is a man who went to prestigious Southern schools (his dad was shot in the 2007 Virginia Tech shooting) rather than prestigious Northern schools (“the” Ohio State and Yale). Instead of going into the military as a way out of Appalachia, Grant had already left Appalachia long ago as a businessman and came back during COVID to work in a purely peaceful, yet also Constitutionally guaranteed, service – the United States Postal Service, with its own sworn oath remarkably similar to that of the military’s. Instead of “spreading Democracy” as a desk jockey PR flack in Baghdad, Grant was the first person outside their homes and families that many people in his rural area of Virginia saw during the global shutdowns of COVID, spreading hope person to person in a manner somewhat reminiscent of the titular Postman of both David Brin’s original book and Kevin Costner’s movie (neither of which Grant ever mentions, to be clear). Instead of learning to fire a rifle from ROTC, Grant learned from his family and friends – including his avid fly fisherman dad. Instead of never really needing one in the safe zones of Baghdad (as Vance himself noted, to be clear), Grant speaks of the necessity of his John Browning designed 1911 pistol in the hinterlands of Appalachia – even against explicit USPS policy, as Grant notes more than once. Instead of the dangers of a broken family, Grant’s dangers come from both his own mind and the natural world around him, including an incident with a hornet nest as well as the burning and freezing of working out of a largely uninsulated metal box.

Now, Grant doesn’t seem to have any ambition for public office – even when Hillbilly Elegy came out, Vance was already running for US Senate – and that is truly one key distinction here. And yet, there are so many other similarities that the dichotomies really do speak to how you, the reader of my review of this book, can begin to get an idea of the overall nature of the book and whether you might be interested in reading it.

In all honesty, this is absolutely one I would recommend for anyone even remotely interested in learning about the lives of a “normal” (if any of us really are) American in a job most of us will never have, but who came to that job during a period where most all of us experienced massive upheaval. (To be clear, I was atypical during that period – the *only* difference in my job was that suddenly I was doing it from my home rather than driving across town to a cubicle I largely hated being in anyway. At the time I was working for a Fortune 50 global bank, and had been for a couple of years already. I wouldn’t leave there until long after the world had regained most normality, such as it had by the mid 2020s at least.)

Now, you may be asking me, “Jeff, why didn’t you deduct a star for relying on COVID so much? You literally did that in your very last review for a book set in that exact same year.” Which is a fair question, because I did do that and I do maintain that I largely don’t want to read anything about that year at all. But it is also a *nonfiction* and specifically *memoir* based look at that year (which also spared it the star deduction for lack of bibliography, as this was purely memoir), and it was clear from the description – that mentions Grant losing his job in March 2020 specifically and becoming a mail carrier after that point – that this book would be covering that period in some manner. Thus, I can’t exactly deduct a star for a real life look at that period that I was explicitly told up front was exactly that.

Overall a truly solid work perhaps more in the vein of the relatively unknown One Bullet Away by Nathaniel Frick (which told of a Dartmouth graduate’s experience as a Marine officer who was among the first “boots on the ground” in both Afghanistan and Iraq in the post 9/11 era) than Hillbilly Elegy, yet also with the direct contrasts between itself and Hillbilly. In other words, compelling, interesting, and…

Very Much Recommended.

This review of Mailman by Steven Starring Grant was originally written on July 14, 2025.

Posted on

#BookReview: The Road That Made America by James Dodson

Phenomenal Esoteric Tale of American History You’ve Likely Never Heard Of Marred By Dearth Of Bibliography.

Looking back on my own ancestry off and on over the years, I’ve traced at least some lines to within a generation or two of when Europeans were in the Americas at all, and most of those lines come from somewhere in the British Isles – mostly England and Ireland (indeed, 5 of 6 historic Counties of Ireland), with a few Rhineland region relatives tossed in at different points for good measure. The ones that I’ve traced that far, they generally showed up in the Americas in Virginia or so and ultimately worked their way along the eastern side of the Appalachian foothills until they reached its southern end in the northwest corner of Georgia, not far from the border with North Carolina and Tennessee in the region known as the Great Smoky Mountains. There, I can trace nearly every line of my family tree to that same region for the past 180 years or so – including one multiple-great grandfather who died fighting for the Union in a battle in northeastern Alabama during the Civil War.

As it turns out, there was a reason my family took the geographic path it did once it got to the region now known as the United States – apparently quite a few immigrants made their way mostly down one particular road that wound its way along this very region from Philadelphia, Pennsylvania all the way to Augusta, Georgia – where even I spent a few years living directly across the river in Aiken, South Carolina.

But what do you care about all of this?

Well… long before the Oregon Trail or the Trail of Tears or other famous trails that took Americans west from the Appalachian Mountains ultimately to the Pacific Ocean, there was the Old Wagon Road. The road that fueled expansion inland *to* the Appalachians, and along which quite a bit of American history took place from the colonial years right up through the Civil War years in particular. This book reveals a lot of that history in stories not as well known by many, even when some of them involve names known by most Americans. Names like Benjamin Franklin and Robert E. Lee and Woodrow Wilson, just to name a few you’ll hear about in this text and recognize.

The real magic here though is in the names you *don’t* recognize. The tales you’ve *never* heard of before. This is where the “real” history of America lies – the history that is rapidly being forgotten and overwritten. The so-called “esoteric” history that supposedly only matters to fanatics and those whose ancestors directly played roles in or who were directly affected by, But one could argue – and Dodson makes a truly excellent case for throughout this book – that this is the very history that builds communities and tightens bonds within them. It is the history that binds people to place and whole to piece. It is the vagaries of one man choosing one path over another – and walking into the history books (for good or ill, at differing times) because of the path he chose that night. It is the history of families and communities coming together to celebrate the great times – and mourn the bad times. It is our history as Americans, and it is my personal history – even though Dodson’s tales here don’t touch on a single name I recognize from my family tree – because it is the history of how the nation came together via the individual and community actions of those who came so long before.

Narratively, this book is both memoir and history, following one man through time and space as he travels the road – as best as he can know it – from its origins in Philadelphia to its terminus in Augusta, learning the history of each place along the way and reflecting on his experience with it.

It is a stirring narrative, both in the communal and personal histories and in Dodson’s ability to craft his words in such an evocative way. And yes, there are sections where no matter your own personal politics, Dodson is likely going to say something you don’t overly like, whether it be espousing support for the so-called “1619 Project” in one chapter or supporting the right for Confederate monuments to exist in seemingly the very next chapter. But don’t defenestrate the book, no matter how tempting iq may be in the moment. Read Dodson’s words, and carefully consider them. This is no polemic. It is a pilgrimage, and one that we’re brought along for the ride on and asked to experience for ourselves via Dodson’s narrative here.

Overall a particularly strong book about histories largely forgotten and certainly far too often ignored. And yet it is this particular strength that also leads to its one flaw: For a book that shows so much history and even references quite a few texts along the way, for the bibliography to be only a page or two is damn near criminal. While the book did contain quite a few personal and direct interviews, there is also quite a bit of history discussed, and it would serve Dodson’s readers to have a more complete bibliography so that they could read up on the same sources he used in his own research.

Very much recommended.

This review of The Road That Made America by James Dodson was originally written on July 5, 2025.